Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine
I used to respect your perspectives at FR. Now, not so much. The establishment Republican leadership are forcing the insideous Mitt Romney down the throats of tea partiers because the establishment fears the rise of the Tea Party. Do the leadership of the gop actually want to win because of nominating a conservative, or because they see little barry bastard as so vulnerable that they now see their chance to install yet the final big government 'moderate' of their non-conservative wet dreams? I believe it is the latter and your defense of that position is very disappointing.

One last thought for you: whom will moderate Catholics vote for, not against but for, when they are informed of the blasphemies and heresies at the heart of MormonISM and learn the true perspective by which Catholics are viewed by LDS inc followers? If nominated, Mitt Romney will get approximately 30% of the votes needed to beat little barry bastard commie. So concentrate on down ticket tea partiers in order to save this nation from the final assault Obama and his communist Cloward-Piven squad will mount the next four years.

201 posted on 04/16/2012 1:20:59 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves. William Pitt

Support Free Republic

227 posted on 04/16/2012 1:39:15 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
I used to respect your perspectives at FR. Now, not so much.

My perspective hasn't changed, fwiw.

The establishment Republican leadership are forcing the insideous Mitt Romney down the throats of tea partiers because the establishment fears the rise of the Tea Party.

This is what I don't understand. We are having a primary. We had Pawlenty, McCotter, Cain, Bachmann, Roemer, Perry, Gingrich and Santorum. These people split the anti-Romney votes in each bitterly contested state race. All of those people could have gotten together with Newt early on when he was obviously superior to them in the debates. But no, we had people insisting that Michelle was better than Newt with his multiple wives. Or Cain was better than Newt because 999 and he was black and would win back the black vote.

I'm opposed to Karl Rove shooting us in the back, but I also oppose the Tea Party shooting each other in the face.

238 posted on 04/16/2012 1:45:03 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
whom will moderate Catholics vote for, not against but for, when they are informed of the blasphemies and heresies at the heart of MormonISM and learn the true perspective by which Catholics are viewed by LDS inc followers?

I don't know, who will they vote for? A guy who believes in God or a guy who believes in Allah and has openly mocked on tape those who "bitterly cling to their god?"

273 posted on 04/16/2012 2:15:38 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson