Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhatHead
You can question DeeDee's (or Crump's) credibility, I suppose, but it seems unlikely either would want to support Zimmerman's story.

Is this the same 'witness' who withheld information from the authorities for three weeks and only came forward after the police tapes and other evidence were released?

Is this the same 'witness' who didn't even bother to check and see what happened to her 'boyfriend' for five days after he told her he was being followed and then the phone went dead?

Yeah..I'd say she has a credibility issue.

61 posted on 04/14/2012 5:18:24 PM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck

Well, the police certainly had the ability to go and question her. The reports that they didn’t do that are one part of the investigation that I find terribly irresponsible (if true.)

And I’m not sure why you think she didn’t bother to check on him for five days. I haven’t read that. But his parents were informed and his name was reported in the local news the next day, so it’s a little hard for me to believe she didn’t know what happened.

And again, her account tends to support Zimmerman’s - hard to figure why she would lie on Zimmerman’s behalf.


65 posted on 04/14/2012 6:35:32 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson