Posted on 04/13/2012 2:49:59 PM PDT by Biggirl
The Legacy Lives On!
Mark’s Lost Dog & Cat Rescue Foundation
“Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles.” --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny
Welcome to “The Levin Lounge”… Step in and have a virtual FRink.
Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic.com!
You can call Mark’s show: 1-877-381-3811
Have a good and blessed night Mark and America. Thank-you for playing Ray Charle’s “America The Beautiful” in advance. Have a good and blessed weekend as well.
Good Night Griffy,Sprity,Pepsi,Sweetie,Muffin,Pee-Wee,Patches,Snowball,Ebony,Mildred,HoBo,Pumpkin,Friskie,Abby,Jackie,Negritia,Midnight,and Goofy. :)=^..^=
And those decesed animals I do not always remember their name(s).
Ready for our walk home Little Desi Kitten/Cat? :)=^..^=
Daria Novak lost in 2nd district to Janet Peckanpaugh. I voted for Daria.
I voted for Ann Brickly, but she lost to the perpetpual Rep. Larson.
Larson is unbeatable in the 1st. He will be there sucking up to Obama and Pelosi the rest of his life.
don’t they have to be 35?
“don’t they have to be 35?”
I’m glad you asked that question. I had to look up the answer: no age requirement.
When I said “over 30,” I was taking a pot shot at Kagen, who I think is scandalously unqualified to serve on SCOTUS-—firstly because she was placed there by Obama for one reason, and one reason only: to vote affirmatively for ObamaCare-—a stooge we are stuck with for decades.
She was an attorney, champion, and cheerleader for ObamaCare (should have recused herself, but she knows why she was selected). I had no respect for her to begin with and have even less now, since she did not recuse herself and after hearing her comments and questions in the oral arguments (politicking, politicking, politicking).
I hope at some point in her life she proves me wrong.
To my surprise, she is 51. I thought she was younger, i.e., late 30’s-early 40’s.
Also to my surprise is this:
NO QUALIFICATIONS!!! except Senate confirmation. NOT EVEN A CITIZEN REQUIREMENT!!!
The Fathers no doubt did not anticipate that a serious nominee would ever be chosen and take the oath while crossing their fingers.
“Because the Constitution sets no qualifications for service as a justice, a president may nominate anyone to serve, subject to Senate confirmation.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Did you know this? (not my Kagan opinions, lol, but the SCOTUS qualifications [or lack thereof]).
My daytime nightmare of post #58 is going to be recurring, with variations on a theme.
wow. thanks for the info!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.