Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ken5050
Assume hypothetically - I saw that and took that into my consideration. But that didn't match this current situation in any way. Not by a long shot. Saying that to Jim was kinda insulting, IMO.

First of all, you are putting words in his mouth. He's not telling anyone to not vote for anyone. He's saying not to use his site .. "We will not waste our limited resources on FR in support for a liberal progressive LIAR candidate."

That's what he's doing. And NOT telling others not to vote, that you are accusing him of to suite your agenda.

He said he's not voting for him. As many many many others here and in my own private life are not either and that was a given when mitt entered the race actually before it.

Go to DU, recruit some of them - he is the perfect candidate for them if any have buyers remorse. They may not know he's a LIBERAL sleazy bag and may be happy to hear it.

You are excerpting my comments with the same degree of accuracy that NBC edited the Zimmerman tape.

There goes the drama. Oh poor you, you are being persecuted while pushing an evil candidate and conservatives will not beat to your drum. Save your 'drama time' for later on when you may really need it.

Or all those who are living in fear start canvasing your area and collect money for Newt. He's the ONLY one that is capable of defeating Barry - mitt is too ill equipped. Mitt didn't even have his coming out vetting party - lots of fun for the libs with that one as they 'covered' him for so long so Barry can feast on him when it's time.

1,378 posted on 04/14/2012 3:37:01 AM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1280 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name
First of all,here was absolutely nothing in my post that was in any way insulting to Jim.

He is clearly stating, and has said so, many times in the past, that under no circumstances will he ever vote for Romney.

Therefore, he has three choices available:

1. Vote for Obama
2. Cast NO vote for president.
3. Write-in a name, which, though I am no expert in election law, may, in some jurisdictions, invalidate his entire ballot.

There are no other options that I am aware of.

As he is loudly saying that he will NOT vote for Romney under any circumstances, it is not unreasonable, given the degree of influence that he has that he is advocating such a position for others.

And so, I repeat..again..such a policy, could easily result in Obama's reelection. My example of what could have happened in Florida in 2000 is valid...

Therefore, it is not unreasonable for me to ask if Jim, and others, are willing to accept such a result.

I can't, therefore, as I said, I will hold my nose and vote for Romney. I will devote my time, and such contributions as I choose, to candidates I believe will make a difference. Here in Florida, we must see that ASlan West is re-elected, and we have a great chance to retire Nelson.

But again, instead of snide comments.."go to DU"...you refuse to confront the key question head on..since Jim has yet to respond, I will ask you...do you honestly think this country will be better off if Obama is re-elected, as opposed to Romney, and are you willing to accept that consequence. I've read, and reread your several posts, and have yet to see you clearly answer the question.

1,751 posted on 04/14/2012 2:22:24 PM PDT by ken5050 (The ONLY reason to support Mitt: The Mormon Tabernacle Choir will appear at the WH each Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1378 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson