Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan
Are you even aware that they were the response to the very first "red scare" in our history?

Don't be insulting. I know exactly why the acts were passed.

So do you believe if people are frightened enough, the Constitution becomes moot?

Do you regard Senator McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover as potential tyrants as well for their opposition to subversion?

Just because Jefferson detested the politicalization of the church didn't mean he wasn't a Christian.

Jefferson's own definition as you have quoted it defines "chr*stianity" as adherence to the ethical concepts taught by J*sus rather than to any dogmatic religion. This is the same "chr*stianity" of the National and World Council of Churches, Barak Obama, and ever liberal chr*stian.

Does your religion reduce to rationalistic ethics as well?

129 posted on 04/12/2012 3:52:02 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator
Do you regard Senator McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover as potential tyrants as well for their opposition to subversion?

LOL! We're talking about the Founders, NOT McCarthy and Hoover.

Stop trying to change the subject and answer the question.

So do you believe if people are frightened enough, the Constitution becomes moot?

-----

Jefferson's own definition as you have quoted it defines "chr*stianity" as adherence to the ethical concepts taught by J*sus rather than to any dogmatic religion.

If a dogmatic religion was used as a cudgel to rob and beat the masses into submission, would that be okay with you as long as it met your personal standard of 'purity'?

-----

Does your religion reduce to rationalistic ethics as well?

'Rationalization' is a subjective term.

Does you religion allow you to pass judgment on the beliefs of others?

132 posted on 04/12/2012 4:10:55 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a ~Person~ as created by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator; MamaTexan

Jefferson’s own definition as you have quoted it defines “chr*stianity” as adherence to the ethical concepts taught by J*sus rather than to any dogmatic religion. This is the same “chr*stianity” of the National and World Council of Churches, Barak Obama, and ever liberal chr*stian.

Really? It seems like a rephrasing of the latter half of James’s (1:27) comment on God’s view of religion:
“Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.”

Or am I misreading the quote? (If so, howso?)

Also, this verse seems to indicate that ‘religious’ ‘traditions’ are of no value in God’s sight; indeed, Jesus himself was harshly critical of ‘tradition’: “[...] And you reject the word of God for the traditions that you deliver, and many things like these you do.” (Mark 7:13, Aramaic Bible in Plain English)


151 posted on 04/13/2012 11:25:42 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson