Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart
“As soon as you answer my question, I’ll be happy to address yours. Again, Go ahead and explain to me how voting for Mitt is acceptable without abandoning everything you claim to believe in as a conservative.”
__________________________________________________

Well, I guess we're at a quandary here aren't we? Sorry, but I explained my position, and also used the same tactic you've used on others tonight.

You've labled those of us who've decided to vote for Romney (our current reality) as “Romneybots”, “RINOs”, “Dumb” etc. You've self-rightously said that we're giving up our conservative values because Romney is a RINO. I've clearly and concisely explained numerous times this evening that we're faced with a monumentally difficult decision here. For many of us, while he's not the ideal choice, Romney is a far better choice than the Marxist currently holding our nation hostage.

If you can so easily label those of us who will be voting for Romney with your pejoratives, we can do the same to you. Again, your decision to act like spoiled, selfish, crybaby and not vote on election night, will effectively aid the Marxist in winning a second term, and sure destruction of our nation. In my estimation, this most certainly shows that you, and others opting not to vote for Romney (our reality), have given up your conservative values and ideals. To knowingly hand a Marxist an election is unconscionable! So, how do you like having others assign motives to you that aren't necessarily true, and call into question your motives and values?

490 posted on 04/11/2012 11:48:25 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: Artcore
For many of us, while he's not the ideal choice, Romney is a far better choice than the Marxist currently holding our nation hostage.

You guys never learn..."Argumentum ad populum" (appeal to majority)...again!

And there is not a dime's difference between the two and you can't show otherwise...which is what the rest of us know.

It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds. Samuel Adams

499 posted on 04/11/2012 11:54:19 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

To: Artcore

You have done nothing but answer a question no one asked. Certainly not the one I did.

So I understand that you cannot and such, babble on to a different topic. So be it. Your non-answer is instructive as to what you believe.

PS, Like it? Hell! I am proud of the fact that Romney voters oppose my words/tactics. Flack/target and all that.

Bedtime for Bonzo. I’ll sleep well knowing my sense of decency/morality is Romney-free and thus, intact. For you I recommend Ambien and a talk with whatever higher power you believe in.


501 posted on 04/11/2012 11:56:38 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

To: Artcore
To knowingly hand a Marxist an election is unconscionable!
If Mitten's positions are basically the same then aren't you handing a Marxist an election anyway no matter upon which side of the aisle he sits?
510 posted on 04/12/2012 12:04:05 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson