[Pilsner]

No, I don't think there is an analogy equal to Mitt's cowardice at all

My Pilate analogy refers not to Mittens, but to those who would rather see BO be reelected, and serve have him serve another term, than dirty their hands, in their opinion, by voting for Romney.

If your best option is terrible, but the other is calamitous, you take the terrible option, and prevent calamity. You don't disdainfully point out how terrible the terrible option is, and allow calamity to occur by default.

[TigersEye]

I know who your analogy referred to and my response to it reflects that. The post you are now responding to was a re-working of your analogy by SoConPubbie and my reply to it pertained to that version.

[SoConPubbie]

My Pilate analogy refers not to Mittens, but to those who would rather see BO be reelected, and serve have him serve another term, than dirty their hands, in their opinion, by voting for Romney.

If your best option is terrible, but the other is calamitous, you take the terrible option, and prevent calamity. You don't disdainfully point out how terrible the terrible option is, and allow calamity to occur by default.

You are advocating for a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal when there are stil 46% of the available delegates to be won in the primaries.

You are doing this on a conservative website dedicated to seeing conservatives elected and Romney defeated.

Why?