Skip to comments.
Fox News Mole Reveals Himself as 8-Year Employee, Worked on ‘The O’Reilly Factor’
TVNewser ^
| April 11, 2012
| Chris Ariens
Posted on 04/11/2012 6:48:46 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
And this puke expects praise and accolades for lacking even the basic amount of professional loyalty, morals and ethics. Just another scumbag gonna write a tell all book.
2
posted on
04/11/2012 6:54:27 PM PDT
by
RetiredTexasVet
(There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
My main beef with Joe Muto, is not that he was a mole.
It’s that he evidently did nothing to stop O’Reilly from interupting his guests, and constantly talking about himself.
3
posted on
04/11/2012 6:58:17 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: RetiredTexasVet
Yeah, but he dug deep and wrote a hard-hitting expose about the Fox news bathroom. Pic’s and all, very enlightening stuff.
To: Leaning Right
But, but, but - O’Reilly is just “lookin’ out for the folks!”
To: Leaning Right
Useless journalism.
Not a hint of a clue of how he was found out. Just woke up one morning and decided to come clean?
6
posted on
04/11/2012 7:06:13 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
("It's easy to make promises you can't keep" - B.H.Obama Feb 23, 2012)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Maybe Fox should sue the employee and Gawker... An employee owes a duty of loyalty to his/her employer.
To: Free ThinkerNY
I read his first two posts. All he found to complain about was the quality of the bathrooms, before they were remodeled. It’s not quite the stuff of a Pulitzer.
8
posted on
04/11/2012 7:19:07 PM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: Free ThinkerNY; Jim Robinson; JesseWatters
I wonder if Joe Muto was the O’Reilly staffer who put the hit on Free Republic with the manufactured comments in that ambush interview I walked in to several years ago?
9
posted on
04/11/2012 7:20:12 PM PDT
by
kristinn
(Dump the Chump in 2012)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I am a weasel, a traitor, a sell-out and every bad word you can throw at me
but as of today, I am free, and I am ready to tell my story, which I wasnt able to fully do for the previous 36 hours.The irony is he just destroyed any credibility it might have had.
10
posted on
04/11/2012 7:22:04 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: kristinn
If it is, it makes oreilly even more naive and stupid then he already is. Allowing himself to be used in order to marginalize conservatives. I would bet he likely is that architect as well as others he could shape Bill’s interviews with.
11
posted on
04/11/2012 7:24:20 PM PDT
by
commonguymd
(Freedom is a myth anymore it seems)
To: Free ThinkerNY
What conservative watches o’rielly anymore anyway. His act went stale a long time ago.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Fox would have to be idiotic to not include clauses in their employment contracts that are standard for many businesses today. For example:
1) Non-competition agreement. For a given number of years you cannot work for a competitor.
2) The company owns all patents and copyrights and derivatives created while in their employ. “Go ahead and write a tell all book. We will get all the gross profits from it. You and the publisher get nothing.”
3) The company owns all proprietary information that could be of benefit to our competitors.
4) All contract disputes must be settled in binding arbitration, in a place and by an arbitrator chosen by the company.
13
posted on
04/11/2012 7:35:19 PM PDT
by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("It is already like a government job," he said, "but with goats." -- Iranian goat smuggler)
To: commonguymd
That segment was nothing like it was presented to me in the pre-interview that was done with someone else with the Factor.
14
posted on
04/11/2012 7:36:05 PM PDT
by
kristinn
(Dump the Chump in 2012)
To: Inspectorette
"OReilly is just lookin out for the folks!"
Nope, no spin there, not even part of a revolution.
15
posted on
04/11/2012 7:41:51 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Inspectorette
He was definitely not looking out for BOR!
16
posted on
04/11/2012 7:44:31 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Free ThinkerNY
“Worked on The OReilly Factor”
Now there is a surprise.... </sarc>
17
posted on
04/11/2012 7:46:10 PM PDT
by
JLS
(How to turn a recession into a depression: elect a Dem president with a big majorities in Congress)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I saw a TV show about Gawker, so I had a look at the website. Had never seen it before. It is pathetic. Half its stories seem to be about homosexuals and its hyper-active language must be written by high-schoolers.
It has failure written all over it. Why some loser would sacrifice his career to be part of it is beyond me.
18
posted on
04/11/2012 7:54:23 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Free ThinkerNY
I think that there are moles infiltrated into many Conservative media productions. This is why hosts seem to become more and more watered down all the time. They are frogs slowly being boiled by leftist infiltrates, who control what information they receive and give them bad advice. O’Reilly is particularly susceptible because he doesn't like the internet, so he doesn't do his own surfing for facts and information, and likely doesn't read his email.
19
posted on
04/11/2012 8:06:52 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
20
posted on
04/11/2012 8:12:53 PM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson