Replies

Well that explains it. Mitt and his Legislature were from Massachusetts, now that I remember. I cant help but think that this list imparts onto Romney the qualities that actually were held by his Leftist Legislature. The Estate tax there is relevant to Marxism. I wonder how that conclusion was reached, that he doesn’t want to abolish it entirely. I bet he wants a lower one than O though.

That list makes a lot of subjective conclusions.
As Romney has changed his position so many times, and the “n”s and “y”s in that list are fixed, it makes the list suspect. If Romney is a chameleon, let him be surrounded by a conservative House and Senate and he’ll assume their positions. Barack’s hammer and sickle however are fixtures that you can depend on. Ain’t that grand. What you don’t want to do in 2012 is enable the genuine article that was raised by communists.

One of those things says he won’t challenge an activist judiciary, yet judge Bork endorsed Romney in 08: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1940419/posts

And it’s time to add a line:
Supported by Newt: N Y Y

And here, the tax policy center says that Romney supports abolishing the estate Tax.
http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/2012/03/01/romney-2-0-generous-tax-cuts-but-how-will-he-pay-for-them/

“Romney’s initial tax plan was blasted by many Republicans as too cautious, so last week he rolled out a far more ambitious proposal. Instead of simply making the 2001/2003 tax cuts permanent , abolishing the estate tax, eliminating taxes on investment income for those making less than $200,000, and cutting corporate tax rates, Romney threw the long ball.”

Very unlike a communist and in contradiction to one of the line items on that list.