So the hypocrites have no problem hiring/employing a divorced woman? And they have no problem hiring/employing an unwed mother (divorced with kids)? The school loses all credibility there.
Their explanation, as presented in that article, sure does seem shaky to me.
In any event she seems to have a strong legal case if the information presented is accurate. (the vagueness of the term “Christian Role Model” in the contract)
It is only hypocritical if the church teaches that such things are sin. Aside from the Catholic Church, I don't know of many that place being divorced on the same level as sex outside of wedlock...