Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkytart
Goodness are you serious? “New” information is what she’d have to have to charge him because the old information didn’t even meet probably cause. The fact she is saying there is “new” information is an indication that will be the justification why she found probable cause when there was none before she came on board.

Better read the article again. The only one saying there is "new" information is WAPO. The Prosecutor merely states she is going to make an announcement. That could mean anything from dropping the investigation to charges. I am betting there will be no charges since the evidence for a conviction isn't there. No Prosecutor wants to go to trial when they know they will lose.

86 posted on 04/10/2012 7:15:42 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: calex59
No Prosecutor wants to go to trial when they know they will lose.

Ordinarily I'd agree with that except...

1) this is a "special prosecutor". And SP's are always dragging things out to justify their own existance and make a career out of a case, and

2) this case is now political. She'll find some portion of the law that will allow her to bring a charge. And then

3) the lawsuit floodgates will open and we'll be treated to a civil case that will make OJ look like a Sunday picnic.

I certainly hope that Zimmerman is seeking asylum in Peru. He's a marked man.

93 posted on 04/10/2012 7:34:20 PM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson