Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones
I don't practice crim law, but from what I know, here's the problem. How often when you tell a story of what happened does it stay the same every single time? How often is there an inconsistency, however minor that can be exploited in cross examination? How often if you tell the truth you possibly admit to violating a technicality of the law?

If Zimmerman screws this up, he'll be at worst - admitting to manslaughter. Despite everything speculated, it's still a grey area if he's guilty or not. In addition, going on Hannity does nothing to help him in court.

Let me put it this way. I wouldn't be talking if I was in his shoes, despite my training.

51 posted on 04/10/2012 3:08:37 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Time for brokered convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Darren McCarty

There is no case here. The SYGlaw states you must be in fear of your life. Injuries or not is not an issue. Who’s to day “Z” did not “fear” for his life?


100 posted on 04/10/2012 4:09:17 PM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Darren McCarty

Your post is very wise.


103 posted on 04/10/2012 4:14:47 PM PDT by DallasSun (Courage~Fear that has said its prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson