” I do believe that it is impossible to read Derbyshire’s article without the context of what it was in reply to and I would ask any interested readers to go to the links he cited in his Taki article and read them and then it will be possible to understand his article as the counterpoise it crafted to be.”
Thanks. Let’s hope more than one or two get it.
Looking up I chuckle to see how poorly spelled and unedited my post at 61 appears. I was in a hurry to get out to lunch — its always context as well as content is all I can say.