Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative
What’s that...”Larceny Under $1.00” ?

Actually the title of the story is misleading, he wasn't charged with theft at all, but disorderly conduct. This was probably a good call by the authorities as it would be hard to convict on larceny theft for picking up some sand. There was a case similar to this when I was an intern at a law office back in my college days. The gist of it was the owner of a mobile home park wanted a resident charged with theft because they filled up large a tank with water from his spigots. However because he provided the water free of charge and didn't specify a limit, the courts viewed it as having no value regardless if a customer used 1 gallon or 50,000 gallons.

7 posted on 04/09/2012 1:16:56 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: apillar

I can’t imagine why they didn’t just ignore the fool.


12 posted on 04/09/2012 1:24:45 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson