The first time I looked at that, I too thought they'd screwed up. Until I saw that the 3.62% is of the 2% block of all the GG components and of that the Human portion is the 3.4%. So it's 3.4% of 3.62% of 2% - doesn't even reach the noise level in any other observations!
oh i see- Math waqs never my strong point lol- but it is very apaprent, that we could actually multiply our output of CO2 1000% and still only be contributing only 3% to the scant 2% of CO2 in the atmosphere (or thereabouts, if I didn’t mess up the math) So in essence, ALL businesses across hte glob could increase their output 1000% and stikll not even make a dent in the total amount in atmosphere-
Global warmign scientsist make it seem as htough our atmosphere is ‘full to hte brim with CO2 and that if ‘we don’t act onw, it will soon bwe too late’ but the fact is over 1000’s of years, man has had very very little impact on the total amount in atmosphere- not even 1%- they make it seem as htough the atmosphere can’t sustain hardly any more- and that it’s at a ‘breakign point’- as though the ‘glass were full to hte brim’ and addign any more will cause it to spill over
How they can get away wkith htese massive distortions is beyond me-