Replies

Everybody seems to be upset about Derbyshire's multi-part point 10). I think perhaps he does go off the track a bit into near-racism in points 11) to 15), but he's in the most trouble for 10) because he put into print important truths that should best remain a "white oral tradition". :)

I live in a city where black crime is near zero. So is the black population. The most common violent crime here seems to be bank or home robbery - nearly always committed by white male transients. A gathering such as Derbyshire mentions in 10) almost never happens, so it's easy to avoid. Black people I've met here almost always fall into his "IWSB" category - and I guarantee you they are giving their own kids a variation of the point 10) talk before sending them off to social gatherings in the neighboring large city.

10) isn't just for white kids - it's good advice for any citizen of any race who wants to survive the effects of the Left's war on American culture.

I’ve got an 11 year old daughter. In view of the rapidly increasing levels of violence and criminality seen among the black community, I’ve known I’ll need to have a discussion with her for her safety.

Derbyshire’s piece looks to be just what I need.

Everybody seems to be upset about Derbyshire's multi-part point 10). I think perhaps he does go off the track a bit into near-racism in points 11) to 15)

I have something of a problem with the fairness, or rather the informational goodness, of point 11). IQ is to some extent, perhaps a great extent, influenced by nurture and teaching. I read a lot as a kid, thanks to Canadian Maritime winters, so my reading and IQ (as tested) prospered apace. So would anyone's who read a lot, as opposed to a kid (regardless of ethnos) who played videogames nonstop, or who was brought up like wolves in a dysfunctional family that was uneducated and illiterate.

So the IQ tests don't just test native intelligence but something rather different, and culturally loaded.