[bootless]

I will, thanks!

I edited plenty of audiotape in the late 70s while working for various radio stations, including an all-news station in Hartford. Of course, with a reel-to-reel and a splicing block, the physical process was very different than what’s done in the all-digital editing programs. But the mental process is the same, and if you’re working on the network level, you damn well better abide by the “measure-twice-cut-once” practice or you’re gone.

There is absolutely no way this was inadvertent. None.

[Tex-Con-Man]

With digital editing, covering up the obvious edit would have been easy and quick.

I’m thinking the editor wanted to leave it in to alert people it was an edit.

[samantha]

This guy ZAMOST has to be involved, too many connections to NBC and CBS in Miami in Senior Investigative positions,and segue’ to CNN. there is not much info on him,but enough to look further an ask him questions.

[hoosiermama]

Absolutely! We owned a local cable news program for a while. One knows exactly what is being said while editing. THIS was no mistake! Editor knew immediately what final product said. It said what the editor decided he wanted it to say.

Do they think no one else has any experience with equipment? Many high school have audio/visual equipment for sport event use... all run by students.