Posted on 04/06/2012 11:30:41 AM PDT by Libloather
Eric Holder's Letter to the Court Misses Point
By Tara Dodrill | Yahoo! Contributor Network 18 hrs ago
The fact that President Barack Obama was once a constitutional law professor and yet has virtually no understanding or respect for the nation's founding document is mind-boggling.
His comments earlier this week warning the court not to engage in judicial activism was nothing more than hubris. The angry judges demanded a response from Attorney General Eric Holder to determine if the Obama administration believes the court has the power to overturn laws. The controversial attorney general finally drafted the mandated three-page response, but the damage to the administration's reputation was already done, says Fox News.
**SNIP**
Although Holder's letter stated that the court's power is "beyond dispute," he also wrote that laws passed by Congress are "presumptively constitutional," Fox News reports.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
You can go to college using Affirmative Action. While in college AA provides tutors etc to help you graduate. BUT AA will not help you pass the bar exam.
Just a thought.
a law that congress and the people who introduced didnt even read it and know what was in it it is presumed Constitutional? BS BS BS...
$100 contribution to the RNC if theyd make themselves useful - for once - and uncover and release Obama law school Transcripts.
The Rats would have Herman-Cained Obamas college transcript-coverup and secrecy LONG ago - if he were an R not a D.
Get on it RNC we want to see leaked transcripts by MONDAY.
Thanks for the info. I had cut and pasted quite a bit of information on Ovomit’s and Mrs. Ovomit’s lack luster law careers, and the details of how they lost their licenses, but I think it was lost during my last hard drive upgrade. ...If this clown ran as a Republican, he would be crucified by the left’s media.
he obviously didn’t write that syllabus...
there’s no mention of killing babies that might live through a late term abortion...he wouldn’t miss a chance of including that.... /s
BTTT!
a law that congress and the people who introduced didnt even read it and know what was in it it is presumed Constitutional? BS BS BS...
************************************************
I wouldn’t have read it either ,, no point to it as everything is “as the secretary will determine...” ,, there’s no “there” there to judge anything ... and as it is as solid as jello it cannot be presumed to be anything...
Oh, I don't know .... I'd imagine that Ovomit, being of counsel to the ACORN people in the New York redlining case, was at least able to pay back his law-school student loans (unless he was on a full-ticket ride from Saudi .... in which case it was all gravy, unless he tipped-out to the Umma in gratitude). And then there was the Shirley Sherrod black-farmer lawsuitfraud, in which he had to have cleaned up very nicely (and if he was smart, smuggled a couple of mill down to Vonaire or Grand Cayman).
So I should think his law degree was an afterthought after his score, esp. considering that he was being groomed for Great Things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.