“The essential problem with doing what many of us are sorely tempted to do (sit it out) is that Obama is not likely to be a “lame-duck” anything. He is unlike any President we have ever had, and the full weight of the organized Left is poised to move hard and fast behind him if he is re-elected. They mean business this time, and by “business” I mean a power grab beyond imagining, facilitated by a planned insurrection.
Even if you doubt that might happen, consider this: we are one Supreme Court justice away from a radical and permanent alteration of the Constitution from a doctrine of limited government to a tool of social democracy. Romney may not be precisely inclined to support “strict constructionists”, but Obama will certainly appoint radicals. “
I’ve voted for R’s that I agreed with less and less over the years, because I hoped they wouldn’t be as bad as the D’s. Some were.
Now the establishment thinks they can put one up who is clearly as bad as the D, and scare us into voting for him by saying the judges he would appoint might not be as bad as the ones Obama would appoint?
We can look at his record and judges, and see that they are and would be as bad.
Talk is cheap for politicians at election time.
They want conservatives to rally behind Romney because of his words?
There isn’t ANYTHING he can say that would make me vote for him.
They want my vote?
They should have paid attention before they took out the conservative candidates.
I hope Newt wins.
I’d settle for Santorum.
I won’t vote for Mitt.
Then, the RATS and GOP-Es have won.