Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SandyInSeattle

And he does not have a commission. Holding enlisted to a rule designed for officers means that the brass are simply covering their own asses. If he is guilty of anything it is not obeying a direct order, for which he should be punished. That said, he has a limited right that he abused, acting more like a rebellious high school student than a marine.


76 posted on 04/06/2012 12:40:38 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

I didn’t say he was commissioned, that was somebody else.
Article 88 would not apply to him. Article 134 would, though.

Those of us who put in 20+ years in the military, especially those of us who had both enlisted and commissioned time, will see this a bit differently than your average FReeper. We’ve been inside, so we have a bit more clarity on the issue.

Not a criticism, just an observation.


86 posted on 04/06/2012 1:44:40 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson