I saw it in the first televised debates - all 'pre-arranged', all talking points, all lies - deliberately to bring out this outcome. Yes, their 'thumb' was obvious - I know mitt's and the GOP E fingerprints.
....”NEWT GINGRICH
Amy, who is 31 years old and single, supports Newt Gingrich for president. She says, Newts the only one whos a fighter, and who gets what the battles about. She added, Im tired of buying into the candidates Im told to support. I am trusting myself on this one, not the GOPs pick.
The basis for her support included her opinion that Newt has a strong core. When asked to follow up on this point, she said, Hell withstand opposition. And then she said, His strong core makes me feel secure. She also explained that he doesnt care what others think. She says shes looking for a person strong enough to fix what she sees as a fiscal crisis and a loss of confidence in America.
Amy said that another reason she supports Gingrich is that hes smart. This led her to say, Hell expose the other side, and I feel validated when he articulates the positions she feels strongly about.”....
http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/295371
Irrespective of what he did the fact is Michael presided over the greatest Republican electoral come back in 70 years, and one of the best in history!
That's the kind of mess a replacement team should pick up and run with ~ not use as an excuse for their own incontinence and loss of effort for the next election.
I been tellin' you guys that Priebus and his gang do not know how to be winners, have no idea what winning is about, and they'll drag us down to damnable defeat at the hands of the Obots.
They'll tell us that was Michael Steele's fault as well, or was it Bush ~ yeah, they'll say Bush betrayed us to the Democrats.
The way to get rid of Priebus and that crowd of defeated defeatists is to HOLD A DIFFERENT PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATING CONVENTION.
I"d start with a site better known for weekend gun shows that has lots of parking.