If they are breaking into someone's home, they are not innocent. Fools, yes. Innocent, no.
Governor Dayton is trying to swim against the current. Castle doctrine laws are very popular, dispite the massive propaganda campaign against them.
1 posted on
04/05/2012 4:50:17 PM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
While that may sound serious, state law defines that as including a temporary disfigurement. That means a punch to the face and a black eye would allow the use of deadly force.
Anyone over 16 who tries to punch someone else in the face should be intending to use deadly force and expect it to be used against them. Acting shocked when someone rightfully shoots an assailant is retarded.
2 posted on
04/05/2012 5:06:44 PM PDT by
arderkrag
("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
To: marktwain
When I read stuff like this I think of two people...Carl Rowan and Rosie O’Donuts,both of whom are/were vehement opponents of 2nd Amendment rights but weren't opposed to carrying (or USING) firearms themselves.
3 posted on
04/05/2012 5:08:02 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Jimmy Carter Is No Longer The Worst President To Have Served In My Lifetime.)
To: marktwain
Like this guy who just "wandered" into an elderly couple's home
http://www.newson6.com/story/17178698/family-of-tulsa-couple-victimised-in-home-invasion-speak-out?clienttype=printable
The death penalty is too good for this evil scum.
4 posted on
04/05/2012 5:23:47 PM PDT by
mrsmel
To: marktwain
“there is no duty to retreat in a persons home “
If I’m in my own home, I have already retreated, I won’t back up an inch further.
5 posted on
04/06/2012 3:08:56 AM PDT by
Fireone
(Elect a patriot, elect Newt! (did I mention FUBO?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson