To: Mustang Driver
Romney, should he be elected, will likely be like Dwight Eisenhower, a semi-conservative leader. He will not be a Reagan and hopefully not a Nixon. Typically, he’ll ride the line right between the two and that makes him similar to Eisenhower.
We must be cautious. Eisenhower gave us Earl Warren and William Brennan on the Supreme Court and Potter Stewart wasn’t all that great either.
If Romney is a twist with the winds politician, let’s make sure the winds move in a conservative direction. That means controlling the congress and as many governorships and state legislatures as possible.
To: cotton1706
I like Mark Steyn’s line; it’s better to convince an imperfect person to do the right thing than to wair for somebody perfect.
21 posted on
04/05/2012 12:31:01 PM PDT by
Hugin
("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
To: cotton1706
Once Dubya was elected in 2000, all conservative thought and action ceased.
You could see it at the Heritage Foundation site. The site had been a rich source of conservative information until 2000. That's when they stopped posting articles - not a word could be spoken because it would make Dubya look bad.
The same thing will happen with Mitt, only worse. Mitt pretends to have traditional values, but what he has is Mormon values. It will silence conservative thought in America - and the result will be lost knowledge for our young people.
Mitt's election will bring a slow end of our liberty.
45 posted on
04/05/2012 1:00:49 PM PDT by
donna
(Republicans won't change their ways until conservatives draw the line.)
To: cotton1706
Romney, should he be elected, will likely be like Dwight Eisenhower, a semi-conservative leader. He will not be a Reagan and hopefully not a Nixon. Typically, hell ride the line right between the two and that makes him similar to Eisenhower.
LMAO, where you getting this crazy idea?
Because Romney's electoral history goes against everything you just said.
Romney's one election win was done running on a pro-abortion, pro-sodomy platform. Once he realized he couldn't win another term, and started eying the White House, he pretended to change his stances and pretended to be a Conservative, but his entire political history before he started running for the White House was based on a very liberal mindset.
The only difference between a liberal like Romney with an (R) next to his name, and a liberal like Obama with a (D) next to his name is how fast they are going to take you down the road to socialism. Obama wants to head there at top speed, Romney is willing to go slow enough that gullible Republicans don't realize where he's taking them.
And may God help us, because there are a lot of gullible Republicans who are burying their heads in the sand over Romney.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson