Replies

You're talking the sad, sad, common-sense truth.

People are so busy looking behind them in their panic, that they're failing to watch where they're headed. They forget that in voting "against" something, they are also voting FOR something, and voting FOR liberalism always empowers liberalism.

Courage -- including the courage to risk a much-weakened Obama for another four years as the price of fighting to preserve the Republican party as an antidote to liberalism -- is our best chance of being victorious in the long term to save America from socialism. The best way to weaken Obama AND Romney, regardless of who wins, is to vote third-party to dilute the percentage plurality of the winner.

Romney in the White House, the product of fear, panic, and desperation, would be the the agent that brought the Republican party to surrender to statism and liberalism; Romney would be the catalyst to make the Republican party a wholesale enabler of liberalism and disabler of any Republican fight against it.

Romney has consistently promoted the very crushing government statism that stifles morality, freedom, and prosperity, and which nourishes strife and repression -- cap-and-trade regulation to squelch energy and production; on-demand tax-funded abortion; forced acceptance of open homosexuality in all corners of our lives and punishment for resisting it; nationalized health care. Voting for Romney is NUTS.

This is a post that needs to be read by many.

People who vote for Romney because he's not Obama are just looking for an excuse to vote for Romney, because that's definitely not a reason to vote for Romney.

Romney and Obama both want to take us down the road to socialism. Obama is willing to floor it, while Romney is willing to go slower in and effort to try and make you think that it's okay if he's in the driver seat.

People who vote for Romney because he's not Obama are just looking for an excuse to vote for Romney ...

Sad but true.

It's nice to know I'm not the only one who sees the handwriting on the wall. Thank you. :^)

Anger, hate, despair, even fear anymore, are way past, out of the picture, in how probably a lot of folks view Romney's threat to America. It's plain cold appraisal and reckoning to opt for the most reasonable chance of overcoming socialist creep in America.

Romey, in a place removed from hate or fear or anything else, is the most dangerous because he would give all the things that are killing our freedoms and the mindset behind them, philosophical support from a whole new source -- the "severely conservative" wing of the Republican party.

Romney is very bad news. He was bad news in the 90s, he was bad news in 2004, and he's bad news now. He needs to be vanquished.