Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dusty Road
But wouldn’t they have to release him on bond and wouldn’t the case still go before a grand jury?

He hasn't been arrested or charged and he isn't being held so what is there to release him from? According to the state attorney reviewing the case she doesn't need a grand jury to decide to charge him and take him to trial. She should likewise have the authority to say "there's no case here" and close the matter. She is the one who was assigned by the Governor to make that decision. It would be a slap in her face, and the Governor's, if she decided "no case" and someone else stepped up and said "we still need a grand jury." Who would have the authority to do that? It's the state attorney's job to make that recommendation.

61 posted on 04/05/2012 12:59:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

That was if she decided to arrest him.


62 posted on 04/05/2012 1:30:09 PM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson