Skip to comments.
Again! WH warns of 'unprecedented' SCOTUS ruling
Washington Examiner ^
| 4/4/2012
| Joel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer
Posted on 04/04/2012 1:06:43 PM PDT by tellw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 next last
To: allmost
The j@rk0ff grew up in Indonesia.
Our system is just noise, just crap on his shoe.
81
posted on
04/04/2012 4:31:51 PM PDT
by
PA-RIVER
To: Red Badger
Despite your a polarizing implication, the Precedent may be AC-DC, butt he currently isn't being directly rectified.
That comes after November.
82
posted on
04/04/2012 4:53:01 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
To: Fitzy_888
So what does the judge do if there is no letter - hold the entire Dept of Justice in contempt?
Lock em up and throw away the key?
Works for me!!
83
posted on
04/04/2012 4:54:10 PM PDT
by
djf
(Obama - the "OJ verdict" of presidents!!)
To: PA-RIVER
I cannot argue with your statement.
84
posted on
04/04/2012 5:16:57 PM PDT
by
allmost
To: guardian_of_liberty
Obama was not a professor. He was a lecturer. The difference is like between a master craftsman and a rookie apprentice. Carney lied again, right there.
To: Red Badger
Rectify? Damn near killed ‘em!
/s
To: bunster
To: Mouton
” Now, in the old time usage of the word Professor, he would probably qualify. That usage was a professor was the guy who played the piano in a whore house.”
LMAO!!
88
posted on
04/04/2012 6:21:21 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3
“instructor” = “student teacher”
My dad was a full professor....I know the hierarchy.
89
posted on
04/04/2012 6:30:30 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: guardian_of_liberty
He actually wasn’t a professor, but a lecturer.
90
posted on
04/04/2012 6:35:47 PM PDT
by
Belle22
To: tellw
and he was a law professorThat is a lie. He was NEVER a Law Professor. He taught a class. I suspect that everyone he taught flunked the bar.
To: tellw
the hairsplitting begins. the devil is conversant in the details.
To: tellw
Piss poor politics to likely alienate Kennedy (if he was leaning or undecided)
93
posted on
04/04/2012 8:23:22 PM PDT
by
A_Former_Democrat
(Tawana Brawley, Anita Hill, King Rodney, OJ, Duke Lacrosse, Thugvon Martin. See a pattern?)
To: 70th Division
I was interested because of your post on this. their is a liberal talk show host that points to an 1809 case(I don't have the right year) where the supreme court took power from congress by taking the power from the constitution that they could not only rules on the basis of whether a law was accurately applied but whether it was even constitutional or not.
I'm wondering if you feel or any other posters feel that the Supreme Court usurped this power.
To: guardian_of_liberty
More accurately: a guest lecturer on the 14 th amendment. No more than that.
95
posted on
04/04/2012 9:35:36 PM PDT
by
chiller
(Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
“instructor” = “student teacher” My dad was a full professor....I know the hierarchy.Yes, you were the one who taught me that O. was not actually a "professor."
I am beginning to suspect that leftists have different standards.... Camille Paglia described how the leftist faculty members all give "excellent" ratings to each other's "works."
96
posted on
04/04/2012 10:47:16 PM PDT
by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
To: hal ogen
There is enough corruption and treason to fill many courts for many days. Leavenworth needs to get ready. Those who survive this unraveling will spend much time there.Why should they spend much time there at all? On the other hand, the Federal Execution Chamber at Terre Haute, IN might be more than a little busy, at the end of all this...
the infowarrior
To: Maceman
FWIW:
How many laws has the US Supreme Court declared unconstitutional?
Good to have on hand when they start screaming.
98
posted on
04/04/2012 10:54:04 PM PDT
by
unkus
(Silence Is Consent)
To: Almondjoy
their is a liberal talk show host that points to an 1809 case(I don't have the right year) where the supreme court took power from congress by taking the power from the constitution that they could not only rules on the basis of whether a law was accurately applied but whether it was even constitutional or not.Marbury v Madison, 1803...
the infowarrior
To: RavenLooneyToon
I agree. Good points and perspective.
This evil bastard will get away with as much as he’s allowed.....and so far he’s gotten away with a devestating amount.
100
posted on
04/04/2012 11:00:32 PM PDT
by
unkus
(Silence Is Consent)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson