Supporting a goal that is also supposedly a goal put out on a list (you still have not provided a source for your list) by an enemy of the USA, one that no longer exists, is not.
If Iran says curtailing licentiousness is a goal, and the USSR said that encouraging licentiousness is a goal; then is the person who opens a strip club in the USA guilty of treason for supporting the goals of the USSR - or a patriot for opposing the goals of Iran?
Do you see how a list of 50 goals by the USSR isn't a list of 50 new treasons American citizens can be guilty of?
Do evidently have little understanding or respect for the definition of treason given in our Constitution.
Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record—Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963
I guess you didn't see that?
The rest of your reply is a far fetched extrapolation.