Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Signing on with Romney would make Palin a hypocrite. I’d lose a lot of respect for her.

I don't think accepting the VP slot is a suggestion of total agreement with the candidate. On the contrary, it gives balance to the ticket.

I would respect Palin for accepting the offer so that she can keep an eye on Romney. We need someone we can trust.

It's all a moot point anyway. Romney would NEVER pick Sarah, and I don't really believe McCain truly meant this.

45 posted on 04/04/2012 8:53:46 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Retired Greyhound

“On the contrary, it gives balance to the ticket.”

If the VP would actually fulfill the constitutional role of presiding over the senate, maybe there would be some balance. But when was the last time that happened?

As far as policy and implementation, the VP might as well be Mickey Mouse. Gore used the office to push his AGW scams, and Biden is a potted plant. The office of VP these days is useless.

If Romney picked the most conservative person in the USA, he might fool people on the balance issue, but that conservative would not necessarily have any influence on Romney’s plans for nationalized health care, gay marriage and radical judges.


49 posted on 04/04/2012 9:11:52 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Retired Greyhound

A VP would not balance that ticket. It would only provide cover for a liberal.


81 posted on 04/04/2012 3:09:29 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray Continued Victory for our Troops Still in Afghan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson