[ought-six]

Hey, knuckledragger; it is evident you would oppose any primary challenge to a failing Romney presidency, thus assuring the 2016 election of another Carter or even the return of The Obamateur himself. If Romney wins in 2012 and turns out to be a good president, I would oppose any primary challenge; if, on the other hand he is elected in 2012 and turns out to be a disaster then I will vigorously support a 2016 primary challenge. You can do what you want, and continue along your own special way.

[mkjessup]

You absolute idjit.

As usual you are looking through the wrong end of the kaleidoscope and wondering where all the pretty colors are.

I'm not saying that I would oppose a primary challenge to a hypothetical President Romney, hell no! I'm saying that you and your fellow double-digit IQ amateur analysts don't understand that an incumbent President has the political power and the resources to assure his renomination for a second term. You mention the Buffoon from Georgia Jimmy Carter, were you old enough to remember the primary challenge that was mounted by the late Senator Fat Teddy Kennedy? Do you recall how everyone laughed when Carter said that he would "whip Kennedy's ass"? (and amazingly, Carter managed to prevail in the primaries and secure renomination in '80).

IF Romney ends up the nominee and somehow, someway manages to win the White House, you really believe he's going to be a 'good President'? Hey, be a generous soul and pass out some of whatever-it-is you're smokin', because you can bet the rent money that Romney will turn left minutes after saying "So help me Smith" on Inauguration Day and the expansion of federal power will continue unabated, the Bill of Rights will be fed into the shredder marginally slower than they are right now, and you and your ilk will be eating crow until 2020, because Mitt Witt WILL be renominated in 2016, because he will have the same advantages of incumbency that every two-term President has always had, and it will take a bloody miracle to prevent that.

Now just for sh*ts and giggles, name the last sitting President to be denied renomination for a second term by his party.



(Because I'm such a swell guy, I'll save you having to Google it up, it was President Chester A. Arthur, 1884)

Now you run along and play, and don't eat too many chocolate Easter Eggs and end up with a sore tum-tum, ok?