Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Working Man

I suspect that most of the Justice Department are just standing there and shaking their heads over how this mess has been handled. I don’t think anyone outside of the White House team....really believes this commentary by the President was necessary, and it’s just complicating their business more than what they’d expect.

But I will offer this analysis. This three-page, single-spaced document? It has to agree precisely with what is written into the Constitution...and if not...it’s pretty much going to be talked about for years and years. It’ll end up being named after the guy who wrote it, and probably listed as an item for all Constitutional law students to study.

If I were the guy writing it....I’d just cut and paste from the Constitution, and smile at the judges as I handed it over. You really don’t want this event to get any worse than what it already is.


5 posted on 04/04/2012 3:48:08 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

You make good points, let’s revisit this on Friday.

But one thing is for sure, I am very happy that this requirement was levied on the Justice Department. I wonder if they will deliver it in the required time or if Holder and the boys will need to ‘massage’ it a bit with weasel words and cut-out?

And if that were to happen would the judiciary wake up and see what they have helped to create by their own actions and “judicial Activism”?


10 posted on 04/04/2012 4:11:48 AM PDT by The Working Man (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson