To: Kenny
Are you one of those dignified Romper Room, playground bully conservatives who constantly goad and taunt for a fight around here?
Look at my history. I have never been anything of the sort. Because I am neutral and don't froth at the mouth with vile hate for Romney, somehow makes me a Romney supporter according to you.
I don't like Romney and I have never liked Romney, but if he gets the nomination, which it certainly looks like he will, then I will support him. And that does not mean I have to like it but there is little choice left.
If I ever make a report in polls or trends that Romney just so happens to be winning, I am not the one to blame. Like I told you earlier, those of you who insisted on going for Santorum the way you did, would more than likely guarantee a Romney win. Well here it is, enjoy it; You earned it.
155 posted on
04/03/2012 7:46:47 PM PDT by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
PSYCHO-FREEP says, Look at my history.
OK. During the month of March, out of 23 articles that you posted, 20 were related to the Presidential primary. Of these 20, three were pro-Newt, two were indeterminate in their leanings, and 15 presented Santorum in a negative light. (Your comments were worse than the articles posted.) There were no articles (NONE) that were anti-Romney, even though there were multitudes from which to choose.
Here are a few of the articles posted:
In Wisconsin, Romney links Santorum to 'big labor' (March 29)
Rick Santorums nice-guy persona is turning a bit testy lately (March 27)
Santorum on defensive as race turns to Louisiana (March 24)
Santorums lost message (March 22)
Rick Santorum quiet on economy (March 20)
Specter: I couldn't have done it without Rick (March 16)
Did Santorum beat Gingrich in Mississippi due to Democrat Prank Voting? Alabama? (March 14)
Santorum: "I'd Like Everybody To Get Out" (March 11)
Voters Back Away From Santorum In Ohio (March 6)
Even those articles that you posted that were simply reporting on polls, always cherry-picked polls in which Romney was doing very well, never in polls in which Santorum was leading or doing well.
That was March. February was even worse. Your modus operandi was to present articles critical of Santorum but not of Romney. Yes, glad (and sad) to look at your history.
185 posted on
04/03/2012 8:13:52 PM PDT by
Engraved-on-His-hands
(Mitt Romney is a handbasket driver. I refuse to ride.)
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Santorum is Romney’s main opponent, and has been since February. In your backward logic, this means he is giving Romney the nomination??
Romney has always been the favorite since Palin declined to run and Perry faded. Santorum has had a good run, and he will probably fall short, but he did not give Romney the nomination. How absurd!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson