Sad to hear you say that too.
Romney’s not running on social issues because he’d lose big time. He’s also not running on his socialist past history because he couldn’t claim to be severely conservative if he did.
Politicians, like Mitt, who give tax payer provided cars, car insurance and AAA memberships to welfare recipients are not fiscal conservatives. Politicians who support the gay agenda and fifty dollar abortions are not social conservatives. A politician whose company attempts to fulfill the Red Chinese desire to steal American secrets is not a patriot. Politicians who ban guns don’t support RBKA.
What part of Mitt Romney do you love so much? Or just do you just hate social conservatives so much that any old commie will do.
I'm on the right as much as anyone here. Most of us want the non-RINO alternative, be it Santorum or Gingrich.
I think all three should stay away from sexual, reproductive social issues. We have enough on our plate and it gives the other side a line of inquiry, drilling down that takes attention away from the issues that hurt Obama.
They will paint Santorum as the anti-porn guy and nothing else, like smaller government, states rights, strong military, small and big business, domestic energy production etc. These issues will be forgotten on SNL and the Daley Report.
You can't open yourself up to mockery.