Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay
The way bills are passed today the record of any senator can be interpreted to mean anything to anybody. Witness what we've seen here - all of the GOP candidates - sans the governors - at some point have been accused of nearly everything an elected official can possibly be charged with.

So, since the ACU has an objective method of summing up respective records by the same criteria I tend to trust their assessments.

According to them, Santorum, while not as good as some, is a better conservative choice than most.

Anyway its true all this is increasingly moot.

66 posted on 04/04/2012 12:38:22 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter
The way bills are passed today the record of any senator can be interpreted to mean anything to anybody.

True. In 08 some insisted that Duncan Hunter voted for amnesty despite being tough as nails on border control. After much digging I found that he voted yes to adding a measure to an amnesty bill that the democrats simply weren't going to accept. (In effect voted to force the democrats to kill their own bill)
67 posted on 04/04/2012 12:45:42 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: skeeter

I live in PA and have Voted for Santorum on several occassions, however I always did so with an honest view of the man, not this painted nonsense he’s selling and some folks are buying.

Is he liberal? No, but he is not and never was a limited government guy... NEVER. He spent like water to buy votes when in office, said one thing and did another, etc etc etc.

Obviously he’s more conservative than Obama, or Mitt, but he’s not a huge ideological conservative. He’s also not a very astute or articulate politician. His social conservative views, combined with his abject inability to master the english language in defending them create gaffe after gaffe that frankly make it very easy to paint him as a hateful monster. Something the Left did very successfully in 2006, and the guy hasn’t changed since then. He’d go down just as badly in a national election as he did in 06, yes, even against a disaster like Obama.

I hate Mitt, the very idea that this guy is going to be the nominee makes me want to vomit. However, Mitt Vs O, I will vote Mitt. Lesser of 2 evils,and frankly that’s what the swing voters are going to do as well. This election is the republicans to lose. If the base abandons Mitt, you get Obama. And while I do not look forward to a Mitt administration, just like I didn’t look forward to Bush’s 2nd term, or Bush Srs 1st term, I know it beats the alternative.

If the Base abandons Mitt, O gets 4 more years, if they hold their noses and vote, O gets booted... its going to be a very very weird election cycle IMHO. Mitt will likely be fighting all out base rebellion all the way to election day which may well cost him the election.

What a gigantic fustercluck the GOP has made for themselves.


86 posted on 04/05/2012 7:20:15 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson