To: Christie at the beach
I don’t care WHAT he’s trying to point out. On this score he’s the same as Obama...or worse since Newt proclaims himself to be a Constitutionalist.
6 posted on
04/02/2012 8:38:23 PM PDT by
madison10
(The few times a Liberal shows an ounce of integrity, IMO those incidents are purely accidental)
To: madison10
11 posted on
04/02/2012 8:43:28 PM PDT by
Christie at the beach
(I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
To: madison10
Newt thinks the courts need to be reigned in to prevent them from imposing socialist tyranny by fiat, and Obama wants to reign them to prevent them from rejecting socialist tyranny as unconstitutional.
There is a difference. BTW, your login name is remarkably similar to those of the Obama Truth Squad?
13 posted on
04/02/2012 8:46:39 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: madison10
...Newt proclaims himself to be a Constitutionalist.Which begs the question, if a packed court declares the unconstitutional to be constitutional (or the reverse), what do you do about it?
Having to go before Congress to explain it under questioning might help to minimize that sort of behavior. Their written opinions and dissents are not always clear to those without a law degree.
52 posted on
04/03/2012 10:10:00 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson