[madison10]

It is certainly “controversial” when -0- does it. We don’t want to go there.

[Parley Baer]

“It is certainly “controversial” when -0- does it. We don’t want to go there.”

The Supreme Court has yet to render its opinion. Obama is trying to influence it before the opinion is given. A far cry from what Newt is talking about.

[jeffc]

Not that I'd want the SC to have to explain itself to the Congress, nor the Congress have to explain itself to the SC. Newt goes too far on that.

I do think that the SC, over the years, have interpreted themselves broader powers than what the framers intended. They should stick to interpreting the laws as intended by Congress.