[ What do you mean by isolationism? ]
In response to terrorism we should take a “Direct Numerical Magnitude Response”.
Say some terrorists from “Pockystan” kill 500 people in our country. Ok, then we go over there like the fist of an angry God and kill 5,000 of the terrorists +/- 10% and then leave immediately. And leave with the warning that this time the Multiplier is 10X, each subsequent attack the Multiplier will be raised a Magnitude more, so 100x, 1000x, etc....
It should be a plain spoken Policy that every country will understand.
“Your country directly attacks our civilians or allows terrorist organisations to operate from your country that attack our civilians, and we will keep adding up how many dirtbags in your country we will take out each time and increase the Magnitude per each incident. We will take out all ther terrorists first and if we run out of them, any male that is considered an adult in your culture will then be fair game until your country runs out of adult men.”
If any country is stuipid enough to allow terroists to come over and attack us eventually they will run out adult men long before we run out of civilians. Not only that byt they will run out of adult ment to defend their country leading their own country as “fair game” to any neighboring country.
It sounds downright macavellian, but this policy is the only way to deal with countries that are still socially living 1,000years ago.
Yeah, we agree closely. That is basically my attitude.
We deal with terrorists and pirates in the same manner: punish those who give santuary to the terrorists/pirates. We punish those nations until it hurts so much they want to kill the terrorists/pirates themselves. With no place to operated from or to hide, piracy and terrorism will decline.
This worked quite well in the early 19th century when we dealt with Muslim piracy and brigands in the Mediterranean, and it will continue to work in the 21st century.
I also have an issue with the role the military has been tasked with during the past fifty years. We have morphed from a military used to protect U.S. national interests to a global police force protectiing the international mercantiile community everywhere in the world in the mistaken belief with will maintain world peace.
I hope you will tolerate my soapbox about this, because it is a major part of this forthcoming election, and very important.
What is a “Globalist”?
In the context used here, American power players and Wall Street interests who have dominated international commerce and established monetary structures in a Global network that requires military strength projected worldwide as protection from Third World aggression. It is commonly referred to as protecting US interests overseas but has grown far beyond that in reality as huge international conglomerates have developed and moved American jobs overseas. It has in the past been neither conservative nor liberal in orientation and both Democrats and Republicans have been involved over the decades.
Basically, it is all about money and thus power.
Gobalists like those on Wall Street, first and foremost, see themselves as world citizens, responsible for maintaining peace and security world-wide through commerce. And of course, getting rich is important, too, as it keeps the military ‘machine’ primed and ready to maintain the all important security overseas.
That military is paid for by tax revenue and staffed by the sons and daughters of people who no longer have jobs, as those have all, well mostly all, been moved offshore by the above mentioned “world citizens”.
For those who do not know what I’m talking about, here’s a quick primer: this election in 2012 is all about money, power, and who will eventually wield both here at home and internationally.
Gov.Mitt Romney is the candidate for the elitist Republicans who are, in essense, supporters of Globalism. Wall Street’s business model is international in scope and must have security overseas in order for commerce to thrive.
Obama is a champion of Glabal Social Justice, just communism by another name.
The only thing that matters to Globalists is power and the money that can be made for themselves. They don’t give a damn about the rights of individuals. The common man or woman on the street is just a “unit” to be taxed or obliterated, it matters not to them.
The last thing they want is for conservatives with Bibles and guns asserting their God-given rights and demanding that Washington, D.C., changes how it does business.
Voting in this national election is basically choosing between the Fascism of Romney v. the Communism of Obama.