[Cringing Negativism Network]

How come “moderate” Republicans never unte behind a conservative??

-

OK I'll try;

The GOP-e is in a symbiotic relationship with the far more powerful leftwing elite which controls the messaging in America.

This gives the real media power, ultimate control over the GOP-e. In effect a veto.

The two, combined, are the US "establishment".

Each election, the liberals game each emerging GOP candidate as they become identified. They are studied, and the hard-left decides amongst themselves, which among all the likely candidates pose a real risk to them.

In the 2008 election, that candidate was early on, identified as Duncan Hunter. For 2012, Sarah Palin.

At that point, the real establishment (globalist hardcore left) let it be known to their puppets, "establishment in name only" Republican elites, those were unacceptable, and would cause damage to the mutually beneficial relationship between the elder leftwing, and the junior "conservative" elites.

At that point, the media elite begin their work of marginalizing that problem candidate (in 2008, utterly blacking out any coverage of Duncan Hunter, in 2012 using Alinsky tactics against Governor Palin).

Meanwhile the GOP-e is waiting passively, because that's what the GOP-e does.

Once they've stuck their fingers in the wind long enough to figure out which candidate the real establishment will allow them - they throw the weight of their combined 98 pounds behind that candidate and do the best they can to appear as if they've "led".

[GeronL]

bump

[TexasSecede79366]

OK I'll try;

The GOP-e is in a symbiotic relationship with the far more powerful leftwing elite which controls the messaging in America.

This gives the real media power, ultimate control over the GOP-e. In effect a veto.

The two, combined, are the US "establishment".

Each election, the liberals game each emerging GOP candidate as they become identified. They are studied, and the hard-left decides amongst themselves, which among all the likely candidates pose a real risk to them.

In the 2008 election, that candidate was early on, identified as Duncan Hunter. For 2012, Sarah Palin.

At that point, the real establishment (globalist hardcore left) let it be known to their puppets, "establishment in name only" Republican elites, those were unacceptable, and would cause damage to the mutually beneficial relationship between the elder leftwing, and the junior "conservative" elites.

At that point, the media elite begin their work of marginalizing that problem candidate (in 2008, utterly blacking out any coverage of Duncan Hunter, in 2012 using Alinsky tactics against Governor Palin).

Meanwhile the GOP-e is waiting passively, because that's what the GOP-e does.

Once they've stuck their fingers in the wind long enough to figure out which candidate the real establishment will allow them - they throw the weight of their combined 98 pounds behind that candidate and do the best they can to appear as if they've "led".

I would agree but there are no Ds and Rs in the oligarchy that has been formed in the "Imperial" city.
Look how quickly the "barbarians" from 2010 have been assimilated. Two more years and you won't be able to discern them from the "elites".

I believe the election will be over in June not November and it will be decided already be our rulers. It's a "win win" for the elites
Romney will not employ the same tactics against Obama that he used against his own party(Think "MacLame redux.) and he has nothing else to run on in the general election.