The real irony in what we’re seeing displayed on this thread is that the compromise of self-evident truth, of timeless principle, while sometimes appearing on its surface to have a measure of wisdom, is in fact utter defeat, total surrender, over the long haul.
They claim to be “pragmatic” and “sensible,” not realizing that they are simply short-sighted, unto blindness.
“You reap what you sow” is still the law of nature, even if some crops take longer to come in than others.
I could not agree more. All of the kapo talk from these people reminds me of the play, A Man for All Seasons, when Sir Thomas More asks Richard Rich “Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world... but for Wales?”.
They now are willing to prove their assertions and convictions are nothing more than a few faint lines on a plastic etch-a-sketch . . . but for ROMNEY? It would be funny if it weren’t so base and so tragic.
Romney is not a compromise candidate. Romney is a capitulation candidate.