High Court Justice: Obama Birth Certificate Fishy

An Alabama State Supreme Court justice earlier this week agreed that findings suggesting Barack Obama presented a forged birth certificate to the nation “would raise serious questions about the [document's] authenticity” if presented as evidence in court.

Though the Alabama court denied a a petition filed by Hugh McInnish seeking to require an original copy of Obama’s birth certificate before the sitting president would be allowed on the state’s ballot in November, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern. Ads by Google

Stand with Joe ArpaioShow Your Support for Joe Arpaio! Join The Sheriff Joe Pac Today! SheriffJoePetition.com The Coming Of JesusYou Think You Know The Bible Well? Test Yourself With Our Trivia Game www.BibleTriviaTime.com

Parker writes, “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

Can't help with photo of Lee, but here is another BC with that signature. It was a real person.

*******

I have some questions about this Coats 1962 long form birth certificate:

1. Lee, the registrar signature: Why is Lee's signature on the Coats' long form and on Obama's long form, but it is not on the Nordyke Aug. 1961 long form from the same hospital?

2. In 1961, was Lee the registrar assigned to Coats' hospital as well as Obama's Kapiolani Hospital?

3. My point is this: We need to look at other long form birth certificates from Kapiolani Hospital from 1961 to make sure that Obama's long form is not the ONLY one from Aug. 1961 that has Lee's signature, while all the others from Aug. 1961 have another registrar's signature.

4. Problem: If Obama's long form is the only one that has Lee's signature in 1961 from Kapiolani Hospital while the others from the same hospital have someone else's signature, then I think Obama has a serious problem and some explaining to do.

5. Maria Coats signature compared to Stanley's signature: Look how Coats signature is on the line, while Stanley's signature does not touch the line. Why is that?

6. World Net Daily: In an article at World Net Daily, a computer expert wrote that it was humanely impossible for a person to write his name along that line like Stanley did and not touch the line .

7. In fact, the computer expert wrote that Stanley's signature was perfectly aligned along the line, and it missed touching the line exactly one pixel along the entire length of the signature, which, according to the expert, only a computer could do so perfectly.

8. Again, if Lee's signature is only on Obama's long form from Kapiolani Hospital and not on others from the same hospital and from the same 1961 year---NOTE: we know that Lee's signature is legitimate because we have his signature on the long form birth certificate of Maria Coats from another hospital in 1962--- then I say that Obama has a lot of explaining to do.

*******

This is mirse. My theory above is wrong, because I just saw a Kapiolani birth certificate dated Aug. 23,1961 with V.R. Lee's signature.

I saw it in a 2011 article Corsi wrote at World Net Daily. The Lee signature on the certificate in the World Net Daily article is blanked out, but I saw the same certificate with the Lee signature visible at another site.

My point is this: Contrary to what I was thinking, there is indeed evidence that V. Lee also signed other certificates at Kapiolani hospital in Aug. 1961 just like she signed Obama's long form certificate in Aug. 1961.

So my theory is wrong. That is, I had theorized that if Lee signed ONLY Obama's certificate at Kapiolani Hospital in Aug. 1961 and no other ones, then it would prove that Obama's long form certificate was a fake.

But because I have found another legitimate Aug.1961 certificate on the internet from Kapiolani Hospital with Lee's signature on it just like it is on Obama's Aug. 1961 certificate, I must admit that my theory---that Lee could not have signed Obama's certificate in Aug. 1961--- has been proven wrong. Sorry.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.