Strawmen, ad hominem, begging the question, all the major food groups are represented in your response. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
I have in my possession a Neospirifer Rockymontanus, found in a gravel pit in Ohio, buried alive, over a thousand miles from the oceans.
The data is there for anyone who has eyes to see. Just because academia has been blinding themselves for the last 100 years doesn’t mean that we have to believe what they say.
Camelback most definitely has desert sand caked upon it by the violent over flow of water and sealife, which is found all over the continent. The limestone deposits of the Midwest contain massive amounts of shellfish, all obviously buried alive, and preserved for all generations to see.
I’ll grant the ad hominem against you (not against that quack you mentioned) but the rest you’ll have to prove. I directed every response to a statement you made so I’m not even sure where you’re pulling the strawman from.
Now I’ll admit I’m about as well versed in creation theory as the flat earth theory but I have to accept that you know a bit about what most other people know in the fields paleontology and plate tectonics.
So why even bother telling me you have a fossil (buried alive???) from Ohio...big freakin deal, virtually every single part of the planet was under water at one point or another, outside of a mountain range you’ll be hard pressed to find bedrock that doesn’t contain fossilized sea creatures in some amount.
As for Camelback are you changing your story there? What is this caked desert sand cause I’m pretty sure we’re talking about sandstone which is something entirely different then just sand.
But for the hell of it say you’re right? Explain to me then how desert sand, deposited on a mountain, turns into sandstone without being compressed by overhead deposits...where does the pressure come from to do such a thing?