Yes. All of her testimony pertains to observation after the altercation had concluded.
The police say that she at first refused to give any testimony, then she helped the other witness prepare a sworn statement. The police directly say that Cutcher is not telling the truth about not being asked for her testimony. Cutcher is telling one thing to authorities, and a different thing to the press.
I read your post re her inconsistency (as far as police were concerned. My question is why are people trotting out her statement(s) when by her own admission she didn’t see anything until after the gunshot?
She contends the incident couldn’t have been self defense. How does she know if she didn’t see anything until after the gun shot? It sounds to me like she is agenda driven.