Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stephenjohnbanker; dirtboy; 101stAirborneVet; trappedincanuckistan
If concrete evidence does surface, all of us will look at it fairly.

Certainly. At this point it is perfectly legitimate to believe that Zimmerman committed no crime. It is also legitimate to believe that, even if your "gut" tells you he may have, there isn't actual evidence of that. We may well learn something more - the police have obviously not released all that they know. But those who shrilly assert that it is "obvious" that Zimmerman is guilty, in my view, are basing that conclusion on something other than evaluating the known facts. And my saying that is not "defending Zimmerman."

437 posted on 04/01/2012 12:02:56 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies ]


To: PhatHead

” But those who shrilly assert that it is “obvious” that Zimmerman is guilty, in my view, are basing that conclusion on something other than evaluating the known facts. And my saying that is not “defending Zimmerman.”

If the cops really believed (based upon the evidence at hand) that they had a case, they would have arrested him.
A “suspiction” is no reason to put a man on trial for murder, or even manslaughter.


441 posted on 04/01/2012 12:10:44 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson