Let me analyze just a part of Bill's article.
“At first, it was thought”
BY WHOM? MEDIA? YOU?
“that Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch captain, was the aggressor”
WHERE WOULD ANYONE GET THAT IDEA? An eye witness, John, told the police that night that Zimmerman was attacked by Martin. (police arrived on scene 26 Feb 7:17 pm.) Told a Fox 35 reporter, THE NEXT DAY, (Monday, 27 Feb 2012, 4:55 PM EST) That Martin was the attacker, and Zimmerman was crying out for help.
Read more: Published : Monday, 27 Feb 2012, 4:55 PM EST
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/seminole_news/022712-man-shot-and-killed-in-neighborhood-altercation#ixzz1qiXUM3an http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/seminole_news/022712-man-shot-and-killed-in-neighborhood-altercation#ixzz1qiXUM3an
“because he followed Martin,” Initially yes, but gave up doing that after being told he need not continue to follow suspicious subject, and was returning to his car when attacked BY MARTIN.
“got into a physical scuffle with him and shot him.” WOW how big a truck can I drive through this brilliant statement?
Insinuating that Zimmerman started a fight with Martin and Zimmerman immediately shot Martin.
“But then” NO, IN THE BEGINNING!
“some witnesses” ???? How about an EYE and EAR witness whose apartment windows over look (in very close proximity) to the beating and shooting.
“claim” ???? Just a “claim”? How about testified, reported, told police, stated unequivocally, how about one of those instead?
“that Martin attacked Zimmerman first” FIRST? implying what? That Zimmerman had attacked Martin first earlier? First “this time”? The word “first” in this sentence is totally unnecessary and only confuses the issue.
“and the initial police report said that Zimmerman had blood on his nose and the back of his head after the incident.” While accurate, it is not the whole truth and self serving, when seemingly contradicted by the immediate following sentence...
“However”, AH HA! NOW the REAL truth.
“surveillance video footage that surfaced from the police station is leading to questions about the extent of Zimmerman's injuries.”
“leading to questions about” how long you've been beating your wife.
This claim is just despicable. The video shows NO SUCH THING. The video (enhanced) actually shows the exact opposite! Tieing this video to an assumption that Zimmerman was not injured, is disgusting! Propaganda by a Marxist press. WHY? Just to strike a match in a room full of dynamite or gun powder?
The news media in this country is the REAL enemy. It's not Obama, Reid, or Pelosi. THEY MUST BE DESTROYED! Confronted at every opportunity. We can win total victory only after the Marxist media is defeated.
” The news media in this country is the REAL enemy. It’s not Obama, Reid, or Pelosi. THEY MUST BE DESTROYED! Confronted at every opportunity. We can win total victory only after the Marxist media is defeated. “
FACT!!