[stephenjohnbanker]

” Breathing it in can damage lungs and cause cancers, research has shown.
I’ll bet there’s absolutely no proof of that.”

Harvard Med did a study 20 years ago, that proved second-hand smoke was harmless....just an eye irritant. It was reported once, and buried for eternity : )

[Ditter]

Is 2nd hand smoke the smoke that smokers exhale? I am guessing that is has been filtered through the smokers lungs but what about the smoke that burns off the end of the cigarette? That would be just regular smoke like the smoker inhales, nothing 2nd hand about that.

[A.Hun]

Here is the British Medical Journal peer reviewed study of over 30,000 Californians that were non smokers with smoking spouses that proves second hand smoke has no ill health effects.

http://www.bmj.com/content/326/7398/1057.full

The second hand smoke claims are pure crap.

FWIW