[fr_freak]

Heck, even the use of the word "compound" is somewhat prejudicial. A guy's got a nice house on some property where he and his family can live on their own and it's a "compound"? That word is used by the government so that when they raid it with pseudo-military armored vehicles and snipe the inhabitants, all of the sheep in the US will just shut their eyes and think "Well, after all, it wasn't like it was just somebody's home, it was a compound."

Quite frankly, we should have been rioting after Ruby Ridge and Waco. Because we didn't, the government has gotten bolder and more oppressive, and the average LEOs have even more militarized hardware.

[Monorprise]

“Quite frankly, we should have been rioting after Ruby Ridge and Waco. Because we didn’t, the government has gotten bolder and more oppressive, and the average LEOs have even more militarized hardware.”

I’ve read about Ruby Ridge and was sicken by the story. Waco is a little more fuzzy a no doubt serous problem of an overaggressive government, but no where near as sick as the Ruby Ridge murders.

That being said in regard to your remark about rioting, Conservatives don’t riot, and liberals want to be subjects of the government.

There is nothing to be gained in a riot except mindless destruction of what is largely our own property. In the field of forceful resistance the only logical course of conservative is to wait until enough of them are motivated and organized enough as to kick the Government out.

Something that might never be possible owing to our own human scale limits and the enormous size of the overbearing government. Simply put the larger the government the larger the potential to divide and conquer.

[mrsmel]

Quite frankly, we should have been rioting after Ruby Ridge and Waco. Because we didn't, the government has gotten bolder and more oppressive, and the average LEOs have even more militarized hardware.

You are correct.