Posted on 03/29/2012 12:49:05 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP
No matter who reports it, the facts are the facts. This is a Times article, not an opinion. And if you actually read the article, you might find that is is rather truthful as well as honest about the facts.
Chill out.
Anyone reading my post knows I did not say anything about the report.
I read the article.
My post was just to remind FReepers that Nate is a Journolist member.
LOL, I know this is going to ruin your rant, but I voted for Newt in our Primary, and I would vote for him again because I think he is the best of those running.
If Romney is the nominee, I won't like it any more than you do. We should have, could have, and would have had much better, if ONLY the World would do everything I desire!
But it is what it is............Now we have to figure out what to do next. I has two possible outcomes. A brokered convention, or Romney. I would still prefer the BC.
I would prefer that as well.
It is a strange twist of irony indeed that, as many here prognosticated early on in the Obama regime on scenarios where he might suspend the 22nd, it appears elections in November are going to be canceled anyways due to the absence of a choice.
No Romney, ever, under any circumstances. Sooner Obama than Mitt because that will herald in the unpleasant SHTF scenario sooner rather than later, get it over with, and give us a fighting chance to restore the true liberty and opportunity that all Americans - not just the aristocracy - once knew and cherished.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.