Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Actually Danielle Smith isn't a libertarian (she's a traditional conservative) and Wildrose isn't hard right.

Despite the usual msm (crappy) liberal spin from Yahoo, the PC's have been in power too long, they are from what I read from my Canadian friend "Conservative in Name Only", Wildrose Alliance is the real conservative party in this Albertan Election, and if Wildrose and Danielle Smith pull it off this would be a political earthquake!~

Let's hope it happens.

-JS (Btw I am AMerican, just like to read up on Canadian politica from time-to-time).

http://www.wildrose.ca/

1 posted on 03/28/2012 8:30:33 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1

I’d have to go with Wildrose after the Progressive Conservatives passed a law to regulate private conversations AT HOME between parent and child. (banned parents of homeschooled kids from teaching that homosexuality is a sin)


2 posted on 03/28/2012 8:32:15 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

I am a Texan, but I keep tabs on Israel, South Korea, Venezuela through news and blogs.


3 posted on 03/28/2012 8:34:34 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

I hope they do what the Liberal (conservative) Party in Queensland Australia did the other day


4 posted on 03/28/2012 8:35:43 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Alberta is the place to do it.


7 posted on 03/28/2012 10:21:53 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

You’re right. I’m on my local constituency board and was VP of communications for the Wildrose party as a whole shortly after it got up and running.

It’s more analogous to the old federal Reform party which is now much watered down as Harper’s Conservatives.

Wildrose is just common sense conservative, whereas the provincial Progressive Conservatives are, indeed, CINO’s - the new leader, Redford, actually said she wants to change the province to, basically, make it less conservative and more palatable to the elites in other parts of the country and the world.

Nothing else needs to be said.

Well, that and she has a glass jaw and is a typically liberal hypocrite - saying she wants to take the high road in the campaign and then going negative immediately, with misleading info about Wildrose. Danielle apparently said Redford doesn’t really like Alberta much (hence her wanting to change it into her version of what it should be), and the howls of outrage were immediate and loud.

They also ran the first negative ad, claiming that because Wildrose will repeal a .05 “impaired” driving law that allows for police to convict you on the roadside with no presumption of innocence (and that’s the part, not the drinking and driving part, that Albertans object to), spinning it as “Wildrose is okay with drunk driving.”

You can just about smell their fear. It’s delicious! And it’s about time!

cheers,
Jim


8 posted on 03/29/2012 7:47:28 AM PDT by gymbeau (We're all Breitbart now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson