Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; GregNH
Per GregNH:

“The forger is in Hawaii, no document was printed out.”

I think it is highly unlikely that HI officials had anything to do with creating the forgery. There was no logical, legitimate "adoption" scenario involved in justifying this forged pdf. HI officials most likely only received an electronic image from Chicago (the source of all criminal acts behind Barry) with layers of plausible deniability for the transmission of the pdf to protect both the WH and HI.

HI DOH places a printout of the pdf in the archive, then takes it out and makes a copy and “certifies” it for the charade of having a lawyer take that copy back to the WH.

The key screw-up was failure to flatten the pdf file by the person in the WH entrusted with “releasing” the image to the web.

53 posted on 03/29/2012 9:56:40 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

I would agree with you had the forger not put a smiley face on Alvins signature and an X marks the spot possibly indicating Alvin was ordering him/her to create the document.

All I know is this. When the truth comes out you and I, in the collective, will be high fiveing and back slapping each other all over the place!


54 posted on 03/29/2012 10:04:23 AM PDT by GregNH (>>>>>I am SO ready to join a brigade of pickup trucks to surround DC<<<<<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
I think it is highly unlikely that HI officials had anything to do with creating the forgery. There was no logical, legitimate "adoption" scenario involved in justifying this forged pdf. HI officials most likely only received an electronic image from Chicago (the source of all criminal acts behind Barry) with layers of plausible deniability for the transmission of the pdf to protect both the WH and HI.

HI DOH places a printout of the pdf in the archive, then takes it out and makes a copy and “certifies” it for the charade of having a lawyer take that copy back to the WH.

What you postulate is a criminal conspiracy with the tacit approval/involvement of the DOH staff in Hawaii, as well as the Governor of Hawaii, and Obama's attorney as well.

Unless there is extraordinary evidence to support this extraordinary claim, I have to believe in the more mundane explanation that the document was created legally through the DOH in Hawaii. The only way I can see such a thing happening is if Obama was legally adopted in the past.

I will mention once again, that *I* am adopted, and *I* have a fake birth certificate created by the DOH in my state. It's fake, but it's a LEGAL fake.

I too can go to court to get my adoption set aside and resume using my original last name.

The key screw-up was failure to flatten the pdf file by the person in the WH entrusted with “releasing” the image to the web.

I agree with you on this.

58 posted on 03/29/2012 10:53:33 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson