Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reily

Could Kagan’s not recusing herself be grounds for declaring a mistrial?

If so, would the new trial begin its hearings a year from now, at the earliest?

BTW, is that the sound of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack dragging his feet, or just another Democrat laughing?


29 posted on 03/28/2012 8:29:36 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Graewoulf

Could Kagan’s not recusing herself be grounds for declaring a mistrial?


You can bet the libs are considering the same thing about Scalia and Thomas. One thing is certain. Neither side will accept the courts ruling on this.


30 posted on 03/28/2012 8:44:54 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

If the ruling sides with obama, conservatives could disregard it because of Kagan. If it goes against obama, he could ignore it because of Thomas and Scalia.


32 posted on 03/28/2012 8:50:33 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

what higher judicial authority would declare a USSC trial a mistrial?


42 posted on 03/29/2012 1:33:25 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

what higher judicial authority would declare a USSC trial a mistrial?


43 posted on 03/29/2012 1:33:57 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson