... because it's the Court's function to rewrite the legislature's laws ....
Sit the old lady down, with a box of pencils and some note pads and tell her “You better get started, after all, it was your idea”.
Ginsburg said the court should do a “salvage job,”
A happy consequence of deleting the law in its entirity is that it deletes the funding for all of the Obamacrats which have so far pumped out 10,000 pages of health care regulations which are to support Obamacare.
Well why not? The liberal justices of the SC determined it was their function to make the Solicitor General's case for him too! Just shocking. Appalling.
Great point...Ginsberg’s attitude makes the point that we have been making for years: the left legislates from the bench and sees nothing wrong in doing so. She spoke in an unguarded moment...her comment needs to be played up.
Agreed. "A salvage job"?!? This partisan liberal worm is sitting on the highest court and is nothing more than a rubber stamp and leftist mouthpiece.
That would reduce ObamaKKKARE to a rickety piece of legislation subject to an eternal trail of lawsuits over each and every phrase ~ and subject to a vote by a single justice ~ yea or nay ~ to provide a majority of five.
The Supreme Court would then become "the Death Panel' as each elderly appointee would, in turn, kick the bucket having nothing left in life to do but debate ObamaKKKare.
Sounds like a plan. Get a little guaranteed rotation on the Court and you just never know what they might do.
I had the same thoughts. It's none of their business to do anything but pronounce on the constitutionality of the thing.